So, I have posted my 4 boards for the semester. I did well, according to my Prof., but my "conceptual underpinnings" weren't as developed. In other words, in architecture school they expect you to come of with some narrative that explains your project, OR... complete crap.
An example would be, "I envision my project as the overlapping of layers, both functional and programmatic, which can be seen in the approach I took to form, but also to materials."
My response... G-G-G- GAY
I was just interested in planar elements... actually obsessed. Planes floating over the horizon with nothing holding them up. But, that isn't conceptual enough. Sounds pretty conceptual to me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment